This is a pretty good way to get close to it!
Check out Scream Time Zipline if you want to give this a try. Highly recommended!
Monday, May 25, 2009
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Healthcare Rant

Doctors deserve to retire early and rich.
There, I said it. As healthcare plans and ideas for "fixing" it all are bantered around, please keep this one little sentence in mind. Let's break it down into two pieces.
First, the early part. Why early? Lots of good reasons. First, as we age our talents and skills deteriorate. It's natural. Sure, there are exceptions and notice I didn't say they have to retire early, just that I want them to be able to. I don't want to be operated on by a doctor in his sixties that's still working because he can't afford to retire yet. I wouldn't mind it if he's doing it because he's still one of the best people at what he does, I just don't want doctors hanging on to the profession because they need to financially. Another good reason is that we as humans are naturally resistant to change and old doctors learned how to doctor a long time ago. Techniques and procedures improve over time, and education does as well. That's not to say a young doctor will always be better...far from it. I'm just saying it's a good thing in general for a doctor who feels like it is time to move on to be able to.
Okay, now for the potential fire starter...the rich part. Why do doctors deserve to retire rich? It's simple to me. It's very hard to become a doctor. It takes a heavy up front investment of time, energy, and in most cases money to just become a doctor. It should also require a level of initial intelligence that's very high. For that to happen it needs to be a competition to even get accepted into medical schools. That means people need to want to become doctors, and want to in a big way. That competition will weed out those that are less intelligent.
I want that weed-out process. I think it's important to maintaining a high quality of health care. So how do we best achieve it? Well, it certainly isn't by removing one of the biggest incentives to becoming a doctor, and that is money. The role of a doctor in society has and always will be somewhat revered for many reasons, and money has always been one of these. I'm fine with that. I think we should all be fine with that. No, I'm not saying you have to turn every doctor into a multi-millionaire by the time they are forty years old. But I am saying they should be able to retire by 55 to a life of leisure that includes boating, golf, country clubs, and dinner parties with friends. A high level of comfort, if you will. This will help insure the best and the brightest continue to WANT to become a doctor in this country.
Canadian medical schools are having trouble getting enough students from what I understand. This does not bode well for the future of the Canadian medical system, in my opinion. Let's don't let that happen here.
Friday, May 22, 2009
Corporate taxation is just sales tax.

Think about this for a second. Companies are built to make money. That's the purpose. Small companies make money for their owners, bigger businesses make money for their investors. Okay, fine. Can't we just let the government take some of that money? Sure, we can, and we do. But where does it really come from? Most of the time, corporate taxation is leaned toward the big companies because they have the bigger profits to take a percentage of. The companies with the investors. Why? Because they are an easier target. They're busy trying to make the next quarter earnings projections and generally not paying attention to lawmakers. Small business owners, however, would go nuts if you tried to touch THEIR profits. Why? Because that's what they generally pay themselves with. And when they pay themselves the government gets income tax. So it's pretty obvious that if the government dips the company first and then dips the owner's salary, well, they are double dipping.
Now apply that logic to big corporate taxes. Same thing. Only they get away with it. Okay, still, you say fine, those big investors are making big money so they can afford to get double dipped. But that's not the way it works. Those companies are under the same pressure to grow and make money whether they are taxed or not. The only way they can grow and make money is to recoup that tax from somewhere, and that's through charging more to customers, period. End of story. That's where the money COMES FROM. It's more important to look at where it comes from than where it's going in this case. Because it comes from OUR POCKETS. The consumers. And to get that tax paid means WE PAY IT. The investors still have to see their expected return rate or they won't invest and the company will die. So where does that shortfall have to come from? The income side.
So, when the government says they're not going to increase YOUR taxes but instead are going to go after the "big corporations", don't fall for it. They're taxing you right behind your back. The worst part is they're going after companies that may not be able to fight it up front, but once the tax laws are passed they will most certainly spend a LOT of money working around those same laws. There is an entire industry out there of corporate tax services, attorneys, and even huge companies who LOVE to see these things passed. Why? More work for them. But think about this for a second. Sure, it's good to create jobs in some ways, but is it REALLY good to create jobs that do NOTHING but try to circumvent the same government that created the job to begin with? To me that's nothing more than wheel spinning, and it is yet another thing we've now CREATED that does nothing to actually help the overall economy. No product is produced for export. No product is produced for consumption. At the end of the day the people in those jobs exist only because the government created a sandbox for them to play in.
A very expensive sandbox at that.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Mickey's Premium Ice Cream Bars

A couple months ago our friend Jane sent an email to a group of her friends, including

We flew out really early on Saturday morning and stayed through Monday evening on Southwest Airlines. Big plug here...yet again, SWA had great service. I really love that airline.
We stayed at Port Orleans Riverside. That was probably the biggest problem area on the trip, but not for us, for Jane and

Aside from that, everything was okay at Port Orleans, but not great. I typically try to stay at Hampton Inn hotels when I'm traveling to most places because I like that they seem to have clean duvet covers, replace their carpets on good schedules, and generally keep things working well enough to not have lots of room key issues and the like. Port Orleans gets a fail on all of that as they just have typical polyester comforters, fairly old carpets and such, and Jane and Alan had two occasions where their room keys wouldn't work on the new room (in 24 hours!). They did end up with a free night in addition to their small credit for the first night, but our term for the Port Orleans stay was that it was far from "magical." I don't believe these kinds of things are nearly as likely if you stay at a more deluxe resort, so keep that in mind when making your decision on how much to spend on your Disney resort. We were only there two nights, and it was pretty annoying for Jane and Alan.
So what did we do? Everything! Well, dang near it. We stored all our bags and headed for our first park, Animal Kingdom. We chose our park order based on the schedule of hours t

After that,

Next up was getting up and heading to Disney's Blizzard Beach water park. Now this was awesome! Aside from just having a lot of kick-butt slide-type rides, the place is awesome


So after another pre

It was a whirlwind three days, that's for sure. But it was great. Lines weren't that bad, though a few were a little unexpected. One thing Disney does is manage their buses well. That's good for them, but not so good for visitors. By that I mean there are still adequate buses, but they're gonna still be full, too. More often than not we were standing on the bus, and even when sitting they got pretty full. They also manage park hours pretty well and that keeps line length up on the high-demand rides, though again, nothing was too bad right now. One thing to remember is that if you want to go to Hollywood Studios for things like the stunt shows and the backlot tour you can't use evening hours for that. Those shows all seem to stop around 5pm, so you still have to get their early for that stuff. So check those schedules!
We did try hard to maximize fun per dollar, and three days was enough to do a water park, hit every big ride, and not feel like we missed much (though we did want to see a couple of those stunt shows). But you're tired after it all, too. The dreaded "I need a vacation to recover from my vacation" syndrome, as it were. A more laid back approach would have been another day, obviously, but that's gonna cost you. I liked how we did it and felt like it worked out great. I think our only "wish" might have been better accommodations, but then again we might not do it much different if we did it again since we just didn't spend much time there anyway (and while the room key and smoke thing was a major pain for Alan and Jane, it isn't that likely to happen again).
All in all, great trip, fairly affordable, and great fun with great friends.
Friday, May 1, 2009
Ticks suck.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Get your elbows off the table!

So Ashley does what she does when I challenge these things, she googled it. As she read me the results, I became even more convinced that it was a silly rule. It seemed that the most likely culprit of where this originated is noted here, and it's basically that in castles and great houses in England they didn't have large dining tables, they merely erected a temporary table that diners sat on one side of only. If you leaned on the table you could cause it to topple, which is obviously bad. So somewhere along this way this "rule" may have turned into "bad manners."
There are other explanations listed like you could be blocking others from being able to have conversation or if seated close together your elbows could cramp the space of the folks on either side of you. So sure, in those cases perhaps the act of putting your elbows on the table is indeed bad manners. But that's not because you have your elbows on the table, it's because your elbows on the table are infringing upon the will of others. The infringing on the will of others is the bad manners part, and shouldn't carry over to situations where you are NOT bothering anyone else with your elbows on the table. But these days we have enough room at our tables that this is very rarely a problem anyway!
Basically, it's an outdated part of what some folks consider "etiquette." In researching this, I found an interesting comment on a forum about this issue, and it was "etiquette is all about considering other people's sensibilities." I agree, but old rules that no longer bother anyone's sensibilities need a way to go away. Continuing them "because I said so" simply makes no sense.
Now, if you keep reading links on this subject you'll find all manner of other reasons why you shouldn't do it. Most seem contrived or completely outdated to me, and thus I'm now on a mission to destroy this tiny part of "etiquette." This rule must die.
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Where will we find our music?

Oh, don't say iTunes. I just can't fathom a world where Apple's suggestions actually let you find new music you love. Sure, you can sample the new songs from the bands you already know, but past that I've never sat there just trying random artists I've never heard of. I'm sure some people do, but not most. Maybe they ultimately do come up with ways this can work, but for now no amount of "artificial intelligence" can do a good job of recommending music for me. My own assistant, who is pretty good at knowing what I like and don't like about most things, stays pretty befuddled by my music tastes.

Okay, the next way is social networking. Almost everyone is on Facebook or MySpace or Twitter and we all like to "tweet" about what we like, so maybe you hear from your friends who have similar tastes to yours. And then there's the first person, where we're riding in the car together and all listening to only one iPod. Okay, I get that, but it's still not terribly common to do that, I don't think.
You can still listen to the radio, but as has been pointed out by Jane on her blog, the radio can just plain

Another old-fashioned method of finding new music is going to listen to bands at local clubs. But that's more a young person type thing to do. While popular and covering much of the music buying public, it still doesn't reach the vast majority of folks out there, I don't think.
So these days I find I listen to a LOT more satellite radio. I've got it in most of the vehicles I

But maybe more people do have good local radio than not. Maybe those of us who don't were driven to the other alternatives and are doing quite well. Maybe the sum total of these methods is still better than back when it was all just AM radio or, uh, before radio at all (duh) and there is no problem whatsoever. I don't know. I just know it seems more difficult for me to find new music that I like these days. Seems like when I put the effort in I find it, so it's not a lack of music options. Maybe I'm just lazier. Or maybe I'm just pickier.
There was an

At any rate, I suppose my point here is a general question more than any good point. How do you find your new music? I also wonder if there are people out there that don't care if they find new music or not. Do you get old and set in your ways such that you've heard all the new music you want to hear and will now just settle in with your collection and call it quits outside of that? Would it be okay if I did that? I sort of hope not, in one way, but in another, maybe that would be fine. Or do most people have no urge to find new music and just let it find them? Or do most people enjoy the hunt more than I do and find that all these new tools really make their lives easier, even if they spend more time doing it?
Man, I'm full of questions on this topic. I should have been in bed 45 minutes ago. But instead I was watching What's Happening minisodes on YouTube. *sigh*
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)